컨텐츠 바로기기

HOME > 통합검색

Korea Planners Association 통합검색

'토지' 에 관한 검색 결과입니다.

전체선택

  • 중국 토지이용제도 특성에 관한 연구 2008년 6월 내용보기 초록보기

    저자 : 정매화, 최막중

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 출간년월 논문제목 본문 논문초록 논문저자 저널종류
    2008년 6월 중국 토지이용제도 특성에 관한 연구 Abstract
    Ⅰ. 서론
    Ⅱ. 중국 토지이용제도의 변천과 현황
    Ⅲ. 중국 토이지용제도의 특성
    Ⅳ. 결론: 평가와 과제
    인용문헌
      This paper attempts to abstract the characteristics of Chinese land use planning and regulation systems at both national and urban levels, which have changed significantly since the adoption of reform and open policy in 1978. In plan-making stage, China has dual land use planning system: the national land use plan and the city plan. Though the latter is subject to the former and central government is heavily engaged in preparing both plans in order to protect agricultural land, different administration system often results in conflict of interest in allocating agricultural and urban land uses. In implementation stage, detailed urban design scheme is prepared on district scale and provides the basis for land use regulation and planning permission to control urban development. Planning permit system, supported inherently by nationalized land ownership, is workable as central government enables local government to exercise discreet planning power while local government has sufficient planning capacity. 정매화, 최막중 국토계획
  • 북한과 중국의 토지이용권제도 비교 2015년 10월 초록보기

    저자 : 김미숙, 정매화

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
    • XML xml링크
  • 2015년 10월 북한과 중국의 토지이용권제도 비교 To examine the problems Land Use Right Granting System(LURGS) of North Korea has, we explore its similarities as well as differences between North Korea and China, because that of North Korea seems to follow China’s. We analyze some properties of LURGS like the introduction backgrounds, processes, and other characteristics with respect to each country. The results show that one of the main purposes of the introduction and enlargement of the LURGS in China is to finance to manage local governments. Besides the same intention as China, North Korea has a problem pressing for foreign investments to regenerate its economy with extreme depression. There are differences between the two. First, China started the system in rural land use not urban one, while North Korea did it in urban one. Second, the system of China served urban land use right to foreign corporations after experiencing several stages, while that of North Korea did so, without any preliminary process. One of the biggest differences between the two is that Chinese can enjoy the system, while North Koreans can’t, because the system of North Korea takes only effects on foreign corporations and overseas Korean including North Korea corporations belonging to joint venture with foreign ones. There are some suggestions that firstly, the total amount of land management system is needed in North Korea, because the LURGS changes non urban land use into urban one, secondly, the pricing method of the right should be based on for what the land use will be, not whether its location is in SEZ, lastly, the granting levy should be also based on the standard land price with good reasons. 김미숙, 정매화 국토계획
처음 페이지로전 페이지로 1 다음마지막으로