컨텐츠 바로기기

HOME > 통합검색

Korea Planners Association 통합검색

'토지' 에 관한 검색 결과입니다.

전체선택

  • 토지이용규제에 대한 한국과 미국의 비교 연구 2007년 8월 내용보기 초록보기

    저자 : 정종대, 김지엽

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 출간년월 논문제목 본문 논문초록 논문저자 저널종류
    2007년 8월 토지이용규제에 대한 한국과 미국의 비교 연구 Abstract
    Ⅰ. 서론
    Ⅱ. 한 · 미 토지이용규제의 사적 고찰
    Ⅲ. 토지이용규제와 헌법의 재산권 보장에 대한 관점
    Ⅳ. 한국과 미국의 토지용규제 비교 및 시사점
    Ⅴ. 결론
    인용문헌
      Although Korea and the U.S. share a common goal pursuing public interest in regulating land use, property rights in Korea, which are protected under the constitution, have long been outweighed by public goals and there was little effort to reflect the constitutional rights on land use system. This paper explores as to what the legal significance of the Korean land use system should be fundamentally considered within the constitutional requirements on property rights through comparing to the U.S."s experiences. As a result, this study has found that the Korean legal system began to recognize regulatory taking, which was not accepted until 1998 when the Korea Constitutional Court ruled that the Green Belt law is not consistent with the Constitution based on the similar reasoning to the U.S."s initial case laws on regulatory taking, such as Pennsylvania Coal and Lucas. Consequently, for Korea to have more democratic, advanced system for land use control, legal consistency with the Constitution should be preceded. 정종대, 김지엽 국토계획
  • 용적이양제 도입을 위한 법적 타당성과 법리구성 2013년 2월 초록보기

    저자 : 김지엽, 송시강, 남진

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 2013년 2월 용적이양제 도입을 위한 법적 타당성과 법리구성 The Transfer of Development Rights can be used as an useful urban management tool for, among other things, growth management, preserving landmarks, or protecting environmental quality. In Korea, there have been many attempts to adopt it; but, legal disputes as to whether it can be implemented within the Korean legal system. This paper proposes the legal framework to adopt the TDR in Korea. To do so, it analyzed laws, theories, and legal issues related to TDR. First, it revealed that the legal disputes in the previous studies resulted mainly from misunderstanding the term, Development Rights. Second, it found that TDR is not related to the fundamental concepts of the Korean property law, but it is just one of the values attached to each land property. Finally, it provides a foundation for the legal theories to implement TDR in Korea based on the Korean property laws, the Korean FAR(Floor Area Ratio) system, and the principles of the Korea regulatory taking laws. 김지엽, 송시강, 남진 국토계획
처음 페이지로전 페이지로 1 다음마지막으로