컨텐츠 바로기기

HOME > 통합검색

Korea Planners Association 통합검색

'토지' 에 관한 검색 결과입니다.

전체선택

  • 현금대체보상제도의 운용실태 분석 연구 2012년 10월 내용보기 초록보기

    저자 : 김미숙, 윤정란, 장혜선

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 출간년월 논문제목 본문 논문초록 논문저자 저널종류
    2012년 10월 현금대체보상제도의 운용실태 분석 연구 Abstract
    Ⅰ. 서론
    Ⅱ. 현금대체보상 관련 제도 고찰
    Ⅲ. 현금대체보상의 운용실태 분석
    Ⅳ. 현금대체보상 운용실적에의 영향요인
    Ⅴ. 결론
    인용문헌
      Compensation Method to Substitute Cash becomes the barrier to project implementation and also increase liquidity in real a estate market. Compensation Method to Substitute Cash is very critical to society as well as developers. The study analyzes the implementation characteristics of compensation Method to Substitute Cash for about 200 or so Bond Compensation areas and 28 Substitute Land Compensation ones during last decade. The results show that the amounts of Land Compensation expenditure increase since 2000. Compensation Method to Substitute Cash also increases, but the ratio of total Compensation expenditure 23.4% is very small. The yearly characteristics of Compensation to Substitute Cash show that major turning points appeared in 2006 and 2009. By regional Characteristics, Seoul Metropolitan Region has 80.7% of the Bond Compensation, while it has 74.4% of the Land Compensation expenses during the study period. By project types, projects in industrial park and Boguemjari land housing, Compensations to Substitute Cash has increased, although the total amounts of Land Compensation expenditure decrease. By its relations to the system, Compensation Method to Substitute Cash has increased largely since Real Estate Comprehensive Countermeasures in on August 31, 2005 and a tax favor in 2009 to facilitate Bond Compensation, Substitute Land Compensation. We conclude that the amounts of Compensation Method to Substitute Cash have been more crucially affected by the systemic factors than any other factors like region characteristics, project types, real estate market conditions and so on. 김미숙, 윤정란, 장혜선 국토계획
  • 북한과 중국의 토지이용권제도 비교 2015년 10월 초록보기

    저자 : 김미숙, 정매화

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
    • XML xml링크
  • 2015년 10월 북한과 중국의 토지이용권제도 비교 To examine the problems Land Use Right Granting System(LURGS) of North Korea has, we explore its similarities as well as differences between North Korea and China, because that of North Korea seems to follow China’s. We analyze some properties of LURGS like the introduction backgrounds, processes, and other characteristics with respect to each country. The results show that one of the main purposes of the introduction and enlargement of the LURGS in China is to finance to manage local governments. Besides the same intention as China, North Korea has a problem pressing for foreign investments to regenerate its economy with extreme depression. There are differences between the two. First, China started the system in rural land use not urban one, while North Korea did it in urban one. Second, the system of China served urban land use right to foreign corporations after experiencing several stages, while that of North Korea did so, without any preliminary process. One of the biggest differences between the two is that Chinese can enjoy the system, while North Koreans can’t, because the system of North Korea takes only effects on foreign corporations and overseas Korean including North Korea corporations belonging to joint venture with foreign ones. There are some suggestions that firstly, the total amount of land management system is needed in North Korea, because the LURGS changes non urban land use into urban one, secondly, the pricing method of the right should be based on for what the land use will be, not whether its location is in SEZ, lastly, the granting levy should be also based on the standard land price with good reasons. 김미숙, 정매화 국토계획
처음 페이지로전 페이지로 1 다음마지막으로