컨텐츠 바로기기

HOME > 통합검색

Korea Planners Association 통합검색

'임대주택' 에 관한 검색 결과입니다.

전체선택

  • 사회통합을 고려한 임대주택정책 및 개발사례의 특성 연구 2005년 11월 내용보기 초록보기

    저자 : 서수정, 정경일, 김주진

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 출간년월 논문제목 본문 논문초록 논문저자 저널종류
    2005년 11월 사회통합을 고려한 임대주택정책 및 개발사례의 특성 연구 Abstract
    Ⅰ. 서론
    Ⅱ. 주거지 사회통합 논의와 필요성
    Ⅲ. 사회통합을 위한 주택정책과 지원방안 사례
    Ⅳ. 주거지 사회통합정책의 시사점과 국내 사회통합정책의 방향
    Ⅴ. 결론
    인용문헌
      This study aims at suggesting the policy implications for social integration in public rental housing planned for the mixed-income developments. Several social pathological problems such as social segregation, social conflict, and deteriorated neighborhood in Korea have occurred around the large-scale rental housing complexes exclusively for the lower-income class. It has been advocated that social mix is to improve social exclusions and function a better society. The current approach to social integration is to construct rental housing for the lower class together with private housing for the middle-upper class in the same development, but the outcome hasn’t been successful and satisfactory. In contrast, U.K., U.S. and Japan have applied various policies of social integration to rental housing developments in the public and private sectors. Case studies indicate that the developments designed for social integration include not only physical planning of the development but also social supportive services that lead to self-sufficiency of lower-income residents. The research suggests that the policy for social integration allow low-income residents living in mixed-income developments to maintain their social and economic independence. 서수정, 정경일, 김주진 국토계획
  • 사회적 혼합이 거주자의 사회적 배제와 주변 주택가격에 미치는 영향 2008년 2월 초록보기

    저자 : 김주진, 최막중

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 2008년 2월 사회적 혼합이 거주자의 사회적 배제와 주변 주택가격에 미치는 영향   The objective of this study is to empirically analyze the impacts of social mix development(SMD) and to provide politic implications. Based on the layout by ownership, the SMD types are classified into four: segregated types(isolated type, adjacent type) and mixed types (mixed-in-a-building type, mixed-in-a-complex type). Then this study employs the empirical analysis of 50-year public rental housings in Seoul. The empirical analysis consists of two parts. First, this study analyzes the impacts on social exclusion of public rental housing tenants. Using the survey results, analysis of variance(ANOVA) is employed to test the differences of residents" attitudes in the "mixed type" and "segregated type" in terms of psychological exclusion, anti-social behaviors in neighborhoods, and the discrimination or stigma from the outside. The differences of social capital characteristics are also tested by ANOVA. The second is to analyze the impacts on the housing prices around 50-year public rental housings in Seoul by one- and multi-level hedonic price models. The results can be summarized as follows. First, the degree of social exclusion is different by the SMD types: the degree of social exclusion in the "segregated type" is higher than that in the "mixed type." The social capital is also different by the SMD types. Residents in the "segregated type" show rather negative housing identity and do not show strong community solidarity compared to those in the "mixed type." Second, findings of both one-and multi-level models suggest that the housing prices around 50-year public rental housings tend to be negative with "rental housing units/squared distances from public rental housing" variable. The result of multi-level models is statistically insignificant, implying that external effects of 50-year public rental housings become less significant by random errors on the 2-level model. Third, the outcome of one-level hedonic price model suggests that the negative effect of "mixed type" variables on the housing prices is significantly lower than that of "segregated type" variable. On the other hand, in the multi-level models the SMD type variables are not significant due to the insignificant external effects of public rental housings. Finally, findings from both models indicate that the housing prices in the "mixed-in-a-building type" become lower than those in the "mixed-in-a-complex type" under the same conditions. While the coefficient of SMD type variable in one-level model is significant, that in multi-level models is insignificant. It implies that the impacts of 50-year public rental housings are not critical on housing prices. 김주진, 최막중 국토계획
  • 서울시 50년 공공임대주택이 주변 주택가격에 미치는 영향 2009년 2월 내용보기 초록보기

    저자 : 김주진, 최막중

    • 대한국토·도시계획학회
    • 국토계획
    • 미리보기 미리보기
    • 원문다운 원문다운
  • 2009년 2월 서울시 50년 공공임대주택이 주변 주택가격에 미치는 영향 Abstract
    Ⅰ. 서론
    Ⅱ. 선행연구 고찰
    Ⅲ. 분석틀
    Ⅳ. 분석결과 및 해석
    Ⅴ. 결론
    인용문헌
      This paper empirically analyzes the external effects of public rental housing on neighborhood housing prices in Seoul, employing a multi-level hedonic price model with social mix types included. Social mix types are classified depending upon whether public housing and market housing are located within the same building, within the same estate, or separated by a road. Multi-level model aims at reflecting hierarchical and clustered data structure attributed to the fact that a single public housing affects multiple neighborhood housing. Individual characteristics of neighborhood housing constitute level 1 determinants while social mix type and region-specific locational characteristics of public housing are dealt with at level 2. Estimation results show that neighborhood housing prices tend to decrease as the number of public housing units increases or/and public housing is located at closer location. However the mass and distance effects are significant only at 90% significance level. Difference in social mix type does not significantly affect neighborhood housing prices. Based upon the findings, the paper concludes that negative external effects of public housing on neighborhood housing prices are not a common phenomenon at least. Nevertheless a further investigation is required in order to take into consideration of differences in socioeconomic characteristics among public housing and neighborhood housing occupiers. 김주진, 최막중 국토계획
처음 페이지로전 페이지로 1 다음마지막으로